Pharma reps have a mostly negative image to overcome when venturing out into other clinical laboratory sales areas–often deserved, but sometimes not. If you’re a hiring manager, you shouldn’t dismiss a pharma candidate out of hand–it should be a decision based on the individual, with many factors to consider. If your friendly clinical sales recruiter has submitted such a candidate to you, there must be a reason. If you’re a pharma revenue rep looking to move into clinical laboratory, clinical diagnostics, biotech, medical device, or other healthcare revenue jobs, you should know what you’re up against, as well as how to deal with it.
NEGATIVES:
- They’re spoiled – do they realize this is the real world where you’ve to work for that sale?
- Great pay- base salaries between 55-75 +20 –are they realistic about starting salaries elsewhere?
- Great benefits – you’ve got benefits, but not like Pfizer had?
- No enormous lifting – they haven’t worked as hard as your position requires
- Work in practice groups – are they self-motivated? Were the results really theirs, or did someone else on the team do most of the work?
- No “real” sales experience – they haven’t closed before, and don’t understand the revenue process
POTENTIAL POSITIVES:
- They may have strong technical degrees (life sciences-biology, zoology, chemistry…)
- Many had tough b2b career opportunities in the past and excelled there
- Many are tired of delivering donuts (they get no respect) and wanna really achieve success
- Many are really professional, motivated and just want a chance
What do I think, as a clinical revenue recruiter?
I won’t submit a candidate who has worked for more than 2 pharma companies. Why? Because they must have liked that environment in order to have stayed in it, which means that they won’t like the vastly different environment in pharmaceutical, medical diagnostics, laboratory device, biotech, pathology, or imaging sales.
I won’t consider a candidate who won’t concede that laboratory revenue is a detailing process, not a selling process. Why? They’re disconnected with reality. Pharmaceutical reps, however successful they have been, do not follow a revenue process in which they got to close a sale and ask for the business.
I won’t consider a pharma rep who is more interested in base salary than in total comp. Why? This is obvious: A great sales rep will be much more interested in sales commissions, because they expect to do well and make money off their efforts.
I won’t consider a pharmaceutical rep who can’t provide me with a manager reference (although I really won’t do this with any candidate). Why? In this day of LinkedIn, etc., it’s ridiculous to say you can’t keep in touch. That’s a red flag for me.
On the other hand, I’d be interested in a pharmaceutical rep with a science degree who
(1) hasn’t been in the pharma area long and has realized it’s not the place for him/her, or
(2) has had some success with a real revenue process in the past and wants to get back to it, or
(3) some combination of these with significant motivations to get out of pharmaceuticals, as well as a realistic attitude about pay and career opportunity.
Article courtesy of Peggy McKee - Owner / Senior Recruiter at the nationally
recognized clinical laboratory and medical sales recruiting team of PHC Consulting.
© Copyright 2008 PHC Consulting | All rights reserved
Related posts:
- Major 20 Pharma Company Changes Over the Last 18 Months: How They Affect Pharma Sales Reps In 2008, these were the Major 20 pharma companies: Big…
- Hiring Clinical Sales Reps? First–Review Your Current Team Are you hiring sales reps for clinical sales, clinical revenue,…
- Preparing for a Pharma Sales Job Interview My first question is: Why would you want to? The…

If you are a sales professional or want to become one, or if you are looking for a new sales job, you will face one of the toughest interview processes of any job seeker.
0 Comments on “Why you shouldn’t hire a clinical sales rep for your medical sales job–or should you?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.